Volume 3, Issue 1, April 2019, Pages: 10-20
Victor Christianto1* and Florentin Smarandache2
1Malang Institute of Agriculture, IPM, Malang, INDONESIA
2Dept. Math. & Science, University of New Mexico, Gallup, NM, USA
Questions regarding the formation of the Universe and what was there before the existence of Early Universe have been great interest to mankind of all times. In recent decades, the Big Bang as described by the Lambda CDMStandard Model Cosmology has become widely accepted by majority of physics and cosmology communities. Among other things, we can cite A.A. Grib & Pavlov who pointed out some problems of heavy particles creation out of vacuum and also other proposal of Creatio ex nihilo theory (CET). But the philosophical problems remain, as Vaas pointed out: Did the universe have a beginning or does it exist forever, i.e. is it eternal at least in relation to the past? This fundamental question was a main topic in ancient philosophy of nature and the Middle Ages, and still has its revival in modern physical cosmology both in the controversy between the big bang and steady state models some decades ago and in the contemporary attempts to explain the big bang within a quantum cosmological (vacuum fluctuation) framework. In this paper we argue that Neutrosophic Logic offers a resolution to the long standing disputes between beginning and eternity of the Universe. In other words, in this respect we agree with Vaas, i.e. it can be shown: \how a conceptual and perhaps physical solution of the temporal aspect of Immanuel Kant’s "first antinomy of pure reason\ is possible, i.e. how our universe in some respect could have both a beginning and an eternal existence. Therefore, paradoxically, there might have been a time before time or a beginning of time in time." By the help of computational simulation, we also show how a model of early Universe with rotation can fit this new picture. Further observations are recommended.
Big Bang, Steady state, rotating universe, fluid, singularity-free, cosmology model, early Universe, the book of Genesis, Spirit, Creation.
1. http://learn-biblical-hebrew.com/hebrew-scripture/beginning-genesis-11-24a/appendix/creatio-ex-materia-genesis- 11-2/
2. Halton Arp. The Observational Impetus For Le Sage Gravity. url: http://www.haltonarp.com/articles/the observational impetus for le sage gravity.
3. Rudiger Vaas. Time before Time: Classifications of universes in contemporary cosmology, and how to avoid the antinomy of the beginning and eternity of the world. arXiv: 0408111.
4. Paul Copan. IS CREATIO EX NIHILO A POST-BIBLICAL INVENTION? AN EXAMINATION OF GERHARD MAY’S PROPOSAL. TRINJ 17NS (1996)
5. Helge Kragh. Cosmology and the Origin of the Universe: Historical and Conceptual Perspectives. arXiv: 1706.00726
6. Amos Yong. The Spirit in Creation. Cambridge: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publ. Co., 2011
7. Gerhard F. Hasel. The polemic nature of the Genesis Cosmology. The Evangelical Quarterly.
8. Ildus S. Nurgaliev. E pur si muove! arXiv: 1210.4091. [8a] see also Singularities are averted by vortices. 13th Gravitational Conference { International Conference on Gravitation, Cosmology and Astrophysics. June 23-28, 2008. Peoples Friendship University of Russia (PFUR), Moscow, Russia. Abstracts. Published by PFUR, ISBN 978-5-209-03274-8, pp. 117{118; [8b] Also in Gravitation and Cosmology vol. 16 no. 4 (2010) pp. 313-315.
9. Victor Christianto & Florentin Smarandache & Yunita Umniyati. Solving Numerically Ermakov-type Equation for Newtonian Cosmology Model with Vortex. Prespacetime Journal, Oct. 2017. www.prespacetime.com
10. V. Christianto "An Outline of Cosmology Based on Interpretation of the Johannine Prologue", The Bulletin of Society for Mathematical Services and Standards, Vol. 11, pp. 4-12, 2014. url: https://www.scipress.com/BSMaSS.11.4
11. V. Christianto. Four Possible Applications of a Navier-Stokes Cosmology. Prespacetime Journal Vol. 6 No. 11 (2015) url: http://www.prespacetime.com
12. V. Christianto. A Possible Route to Navier-Stokes Cosmology on Cantor Sets. Prespacetime Journal Vol. 6 No. 8 (2015). url: http://www.prespacetime.com
13. V. Christianto. A Theo-Cymatic Reading of Prolegomena of St. John’s Gospel. Scientific GOD Journal, Vol. 8 no. 4 (2017), url: http://www.scigod.com/index.php/sgj/article/view/544/595
14. Georgios Vatistas. The presence of interstellar turbulence could explain the velocity flattening in galaxies. arXiv: 1012.1384
15. Wilf Hildebrandt. An Old Testament Theology of the Spirit of God. Peabody: Hendrickson Publisher, Inc., 1995
16. Fedor V. Shugaev, Dmitri Y. Cherkasov and Oxana A. Solenaya. Acoustic radiation by 3D vortex rings in air. Aerospace 2015, 2, 627-636; doi:10.3390/aerospace2040627
17. Anna Rozanova-Pierrat. Approximation of a compressible Navier-Stokes system by non-linear acoustical models. arXiv: 1601.0558 (2016)
18. J-P. Luminet. Editorial note to: Georges Lema^ıtre, A homogeneous universe of constant mass and increasing radius accounting for the radial velocity of extra-galactic nebulae. Gen. Rel. Grav. (2013) 45. url: http://www.physics.umd.edu/grt/taj/675e/Luminet on Lemaitre history.pdf
19. J-P. Luminet. Lemaitre’s Big Bang. Frontiers of Fundamental Physics 14. url: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1503/1503.08304.pdf
20 Simon Mitton. Georges Lemaitre: Life, science, and legacy. url: https: //arxiv.org/ftp /arxiv/papers /1612/1612.03003.pdf
21. Vern Poythress. Redeeming Mathematics: A God-centered approach. Wheaton: Crossway, 2015.
22. Florentin Smarandache, Neutrosophy. Neutrosophic Probability, Set, and Logic, ProQuest Information & Learning, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 105 p., 1998; http://fs.gallup.unm.edu/eBook-neutrosophics6.pdf (edition online).
23. Florentin Smarandache, n-Valued Refined Neutrosophic Logic and Its Applications in Physics, Progress in Physics, 143-146, Vol. 4, 2013; http://fs.gallup.unm.edu/n-ValuedNeutrosophicLogic-PiP.pdf
24. F. Smarandache, Neutrosophic Overset, Neutrosophic Underset, and Neutrosophic Offset. Similarly for Neutrosophic Over-/Under-/Off- Logic, Probability, and Statistics, 168 p., Pons Editions, Brussels, Belgium, 2016, on Cornell University’s website: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1607/1607.00234.pdf
25. Alan H. Guth. Inflation. Carnegie Observatories Astrophysics Series, Vol. 2: Measuring and Modeling the Universe, 2004 ed. W. L. Freedman (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press)
26. Alan H. Guth. Eternal Inflation. MIT-CTP-3007, arXiv: astro-ph/0101507
27. S. Hollands & R.M. Wald. An alternative to inflation. arXiv: gr-qc/0205058
28. Stephen Green and R.M. Wald. Newtonian and Relativistic Cosmologies. arXiv: 1111.2997
29. Moshe Carmeli. Aspects of Cosmological Relativity. 1999. http://cds.cern.ch/record/394536/files/9907080.pdf; [29a] see also M. Carmeli. Cosmological Relativity: The Special and General Theories for the Structure of the Universe. World Scientific Publ. url: https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/6275
30. I. Nurgaliev. E pur si muove! Arxiv: 1210.4091 (2012)
31. I.I. Vasenev & Ildus Nurgaliev. Turbulent Model of Trace Gas Flux in Boundary Layer. Arxiv: 1303.0832
32. A.A. Grib & Yu V. Pavlov. Particle creation in the early Universe: achievements and problems. arXiv: 1601.06618 (2016)
33. M. Lincoln & A. Wasser. Spontaneous creation of the Universe ex nihilo. Physics of the Dark Universe 2 (2013): 195-199
34. E. Hubble. THE OBSERVATIONAL APPROACH TO COSMOLOGY, 1937. url:https: //ned.ipac.caltech.edu /level5/Sept04/Hubble/paper.pdf
35. E. Hubble. A RELATION BETWEEN DISTANCE AND RADIAL VELOCITY AMONG EXTRAGALACTIC NEBULAE. PNAS March 15, 1929 15 (3) 168-173; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.15.3.168. url: http://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/15/3/168.full.pdf
